Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 M260DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 M260DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 M260DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3800

2008

Why buy it

✅73.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
166.3% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M260DX

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 164.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 73.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (824 vs 817), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M260DX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $499 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 164.1% (2.7 vs 1.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M260DX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3800 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 M260DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3800

The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R7 M260DX

The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3800 scores 824 and the Radeon R7 M260DX reaches 817 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 M260DX uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX).

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 M260DX
G3D Mark Score	824	817
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS+13%	0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 M260DX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260DX carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260DX.

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 M260DX
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 M260DX
DirectX	10_0	12_0+20%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 M260DX
Encoder	PureVideo HD	VCE 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD	UVD 4.2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3800 draws 189W versus the Radeon R7 M260DX's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon R7 M260DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 M260DX
TDP	189W	75W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	1mm	1mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Perf/Watt	4.4	10.9+148%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3800 came in at $799, while the Radeon R7 M260DX launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M260DX was 62.5% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (Quadro FX 3800) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) — the Radeon R7 M260DX offers 170% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260DX (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3800	Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP	$799	$300-62%
Performance per Dollar	1.0	2.7+170%
Codename	GT200B	Opal
Release	November 11 2008	December 6 2015
Ranking	#815	#878

Search Quadro FX 3800 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260DX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.