Radeon R7 A8-7500 vs Radeon R7 M260DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A8-7500 vs Radeon R7 M260DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A8-7500 vs Radeon R7 M260DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A8-7500

2015

Why buy it

✅97.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 197.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.1 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M260DX

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A8-7500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
200% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A8-7500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 97.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M260DX instead at 817 vs 811, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 A8-7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A8-7500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 197.8% (8.1 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 A8-7500 vs Radeon R7 M260DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 A8-7500

The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 811 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R7 M260DX

The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A8-7500 scores 811 and the Radeon R7 M260DX reaches 817 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M260DX uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 715 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 A8-7500	Radeon R7 M260DX
G3D Mark Score	811	817
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024+167%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.997 TFLOPS+264%	0.5491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	975 MHz+36%	715 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24
L1 Cache	256 KB+167%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 A8-7500	Radeon R7 M260DX
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7500 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260DX. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260DX) — the Radeon R7 A8-7500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 A8-7500	Radeon R7 M260DX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A8-7500 draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 M260DX's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R7 M260DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R7 A8-7500	Radeon R7 M260DX
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	8.1	10.9+35%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A8-7500 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M260DX launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7500 was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.1 (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) — the Radeon R7 A8-7500 offers 200% better value.

Feature	Radeon R7 A8-7500	Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP	$100-67%	$300
Performance per Dollar	8.1+200%	2.7
Codename	Trinidad	Opal
Release	June 18 2015	December 6 2015
Ranking	#467	#878

Search Radeon R7 A8-7500 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260DX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.