CPU
GPU
Radeon R7 A8-7500
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M280X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is positioned at rank 154 and the Radeon R9 M280X is on rank 285, so the Radeon R7 A8-7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7500
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M280X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-7500.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A8-7500 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M280X holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A8-7500 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A8-7500 and Radeon R9 M280X
Radeon R7 A8-7500
The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 811 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon R9 M280X
The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A8-7500 scores 811 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7500 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 811 | 814 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | 1000 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7500 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 A8-7500 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M280X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R9 M280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7500 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A8-7500 draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7500 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-50% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 8.1+98% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A8-7500 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.2 (Radeon R7 A8-7500) vs 16.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R9 M280X offers 0.6% better value. The Radeon R7 A8-7500 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A8-7500 | Radeon R9 M280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-60% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.2 | 16.3 |
| Codename | Trinidad | Tahiti |
| Release | June 18 2015 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #467 | #404 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A8-7500 and Radeon R9 M280X
