Radeon R7 M265DX vs GeForce GT 625M
Radeon R7 M265DX
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 625M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M265DX is positioned at rank 564 and the GeForce GT 625M is on rank 219, so the GeForce GT 625M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M265DX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M265DX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 625M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 M265DX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M265DX and GeForce GT 625M
Radeon R7 M265DX
The Radeon R7 M265DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.
GeForce GT 625M
The GeForce GT 625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 485 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M265DX scores 499 and the GeForce GT 625M reaches 485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M265DX is built on GCN while the GeForce GT 625M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs 384 (GeForce GT 625M).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 499+3% | 485 |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M265DX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 625M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 625M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 625M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs No (GeForce GT 625M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 625M).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M265DX draws 75W versus the GeForce GT 625M's 45W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs 350W (GeForce GT 625M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 45W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 10.8+61% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M265DX is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | — | GK107 |
| Release | June 4 2014 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #800 | #828 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M265DX and GeForce GT 625M
