Radeon R7 M265DX vs GeForce GTS 150M
Radeon R7 M265DX
Popular choices:
GeForce GTS 150M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M265DX is positioned at rank 564 and the GeForce GTS 150M is on rank 78, so the GeForce GTS 150M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M265DX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 150M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTS 150M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M265DX.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTS 150M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M265DX and GeForce GTS 150M
Radeon R7 M265DX
The Radeon R7 M265DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.
GeForce GTS 150M
The GeForce GTS 150M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M265DX scores 499 and the GeForce GTS 150M reaches 504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M265DX is built on GCN while the GeForce GTS 150M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 150M).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 499 | 504+1% |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+367% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M265DX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 150M has 1 GB. The GeForce GTS 150M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 150M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+119% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 150M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 150M).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M265DX draws 75W versus the GeForce GTS 150M's 106W — a 34.3% difference. The Radeon R7 M265DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 150M). Power connectors: Mobile vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-29% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7+40% | 4.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M265DX is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | — | GF106 |
| Release | June 4 2014 | September 13 2010 |
| Ranking | #800 | #791 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M265DX and GeForce GTS 150M
