Radeon R7 M265DX vs Radeon HD 8650G
Radeon R7 M265DX
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8650G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M265DX is positioned at rank 564 and the Radeon HD 8650G is on rank 125, so the Radeon HD 8650G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M265DX
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8650G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M265DX.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M265DX | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M265DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M265DX holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 24.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M265DX | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+24.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M265DX and Radeon HD 8650G
Radeon R7 M265DX
The Radeon R7 M265DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.
Radeon HD 8650G
The Radeon HD 8650G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 501 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M265DX scores 499 and the Radeon HD 8650G reaches 501 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M265DX is built on GCN while the Radeon HD 8650G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650G).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 499 | 501 |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1024+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M265DX draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8650G's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The Radeon R7 M265DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-42% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7+72% | 3.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M265DX launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 8650G launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Radeon R7 M265DX costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.5 (Radeon R7 M265DX) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 8650G) — the Radeon R7 M265DX offers 25% better value. The Radeon R7 M265DX is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M265DX | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $50-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5+25% | 10.0 |
| Codename | — | Pitcairn |
| Release | June 4 2014 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #800 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M265DX and Radeon HD 8650G
