CPU
GPU
Radeon R7 M365X
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M365X is positioned at rank 602 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K is on rank 176, so the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M365X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M365X.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 A8-7670K holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $300), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 516.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+516.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Radeon R7 M365X
The Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points.
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 847 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M365X scores 824 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K reaches 847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M365X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 847+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+111% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 975 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7670K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+20% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs H.264,HEVC (Partial),MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC (Partial),MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M365X draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7670K's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R7 M365X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.0+29% | 8.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M365X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K launched at $118 and now averages $50. The Radeon R7 A8-7670K costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 16.9 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers 525.9% better value. The Radeon R7 M365X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $118-61% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $50-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 16.9+526% |
| Codename | Tropo | Trinidad |
| Release | May 15 2016 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #715 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon R7 A8-7670K
