
Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U

Radeon R7 M365X
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 M365X is positioned at rank #602 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M365X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M365X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Vega (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U

Radeon R7 M365X
The Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points.

Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M365X scores 824 and the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M365X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 832 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 1.843 TFLOPS+95% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1200 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M365X comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 M365X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M365X draws 75W versus the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.0 | 55.5+405% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M365X launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U costs 100+% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tropo | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | May 15 2016 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #715 | #721 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















