Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 M365X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 M365X is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
2017Why buy it
- ✅37.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Vega (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M365X vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon R7 M365X
The Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points.
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M365X scores 824 and the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M365X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U uses Vega, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 824 | 832 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 1.843 TFLOPS+95% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1200 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M365X has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U carries 0 MB. Radeon R7 M365X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M365X and System on the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M365X draws 75W versus the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M365X) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.0 | 55.5+405% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 M365X came in at $300, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Radeon R7 M365X) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M365X | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tropo | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | May 15 2016 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #715 | #721 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 M365X and Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
