Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 M365X

AMD

Radeon HD 6650A

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M365X

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 M365X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 M365X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 M365X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6650A

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 204.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M365X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M365X

2016

Why buy it

  • 11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M365X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6650A instead at 836 vs 824, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 6650A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6650A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 204.4% (8.4 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M365X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 M365X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 6650A

The Radeon HD 6650A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 836 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M365X

The Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 6650A scores 836 and the Radeon R7 M365X reaches 824 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6650A is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M365X). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M365X).

FeatureRadeon HD 6650ARadeon R7 M365X
G3D Mark Score
836+1%
824
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
512+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.576 TFLOPS
0.9472 TFLOPS+64%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
48 KB
128 KB+167%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 6650ARadeon R7 M365X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6650A and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M365X.

FeatureRadeon HD 6650ARadeon R7 M365X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6650A draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 M365X's 75W — a 50% difference. The Radeon HD 6650A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M365X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 6650ARadeon R7 M365X
TDP
45W-40%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
18.6+69%
11.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6650A came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M365X launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6650A was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.4 (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M365X) — the Radeon HD 6650A offers 211.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M365X (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 6650ARadeon R7 M365X
MSRP
$100-67%
$300
Performance per Dollar
8.4+211%
2.7
Codename
Onega
Tropo
Release
April 19 2011
May 15 2016
Ranking
#926
#715

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.