
Radeon HD 6650A

Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 M365X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 M365X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 M365X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 6650A
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 204.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M365X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R7 M365X
2016Why buy it
- ✅11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6650A vs Radeon R7 M365X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6650A
The Radeon HD 6650A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 836 points.

Radeon R7 M365X
The Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6650A scores 836 and the Radeon R7 M365X reaches 824 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6650A is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M365X). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M365X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 836+1% | 824 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 512+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 0.9472 TFLOPS+64% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6650A and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M365X.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6650A draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 M365X's 75W — a 50% difference. The Radeon HD 6650A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M365X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-40% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.6+69% | 11.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 6650A came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M365X launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6650A was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.4 (Radeon HD 6650A) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M365X) — the Radeon HD 6650A offers 211.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M365X (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6650A | Radeon R7 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-67% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4+211% | 2.7 |
| Codename | Onega | Tropo |
| Release | April 19 2011 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #926 | #715 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














