Radeon R7 M440
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 M440 vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon R7 M440

2016Core: 891 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 M440 is positioned at rank #586 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M440

#576
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3619%
#578
3281%
#579
3272%
#583
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2975%
#584
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2955%
#586
Radeon R7 M440
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#588
Mobility Radeon HD 4350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#589
GeForce 405
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
98%
#590
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#591
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
98%
#592
GeForce 510
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
#593
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#594
GeForce 9300M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
94%
#596
GeForce 9800 GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $20
94%
#598
GeForce 9100M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
92%
#599
GeForce 210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
92%
#600
Mobility Radeon X1900
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
92%
#601
Mobility Radeon HD 4330
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 M440 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 773.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M440.

InsightRadeon R7 M440GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-773.4%)
Leading raw performance (+773.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $300 for the Radeon R7 M440, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 3393.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 M440GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3393.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M440 and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon R7 M440

The Radeon R7 M440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 891 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 901 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 M440 scores 901 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 773.4%. The Radeon R7 M440 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R7 M440) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.5702 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M440) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureRadeon R7 M440GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
901
7,869+773%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
320
896+180%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5702 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+423%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
20
56+180%
L1 Cache
80 KB
896 KB+1020%
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
1 MB+669%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M440GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M440 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M440) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 M440GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
1 MB+669%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R7 M440) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R7 M440GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 M440) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M440) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureRadeon R7 M440GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
UVD 6.0
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M440 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M440) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon R7 M440GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
12.0
104.9+774%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M440 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 75% less ($225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.0 (Radeon R7 M440) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 3396.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon R7 M440GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$300
$149-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$75-75%
Performance per Dollar
3.0
104.9+3397%
Codename
Meso
TU117
Release
May 15 2016
April 23 2019
Ranking
#912
#323