Radeon R7 M465 vs GeForce 920MX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M465 is positioned at rank 384 and the GeForce 920MX is on rank 360, so the GeForce 920MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465

#374

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1230%

#376

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1115%

#377

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1112%

#381

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1011%

#382

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1004%

#384

Radeon R7 M465

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

100%

#386

GeForce GT 640M LE

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

99%

#387

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

98%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

98%

#390

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

97%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

97%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

96%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

95%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#396

GeForce 920A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

94%

#397

GeForce 930A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

94%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX

#350

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1020%

#352

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

925%

#353

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

923%

#357

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

839%

#358

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

833%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

100%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

99%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

95%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

94%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

93%

#372

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#373

Radeon R7 M270DX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

90%

#374

Radeon HD 6670/7670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

90%

#375

Radeon 620

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 920MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M465.

Insight	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce 920MX
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $54), it costs 35% less, resulting in a 53.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce 920MX
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+53.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($35)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($54)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 M465 Benchmark Check

GeForce 920MX Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M465 and GeForce 920MX

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

GeForce 920MX

The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M465 scores 1,059 and the GeForce 920MX reaches 1,064 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M465 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce 920MX uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M465) vs 256 (GeForce 920MX). Raw compute: 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX). Boost clocks: 1125 MHz vs 993 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce 920MX
G3D Mark Score	1,059	1,064
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384+50%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.864 TFLOPS+70%	0.5084 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1125 MHz+13%	993 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	128 KB+33%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce 920MX
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M465) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce 920MX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M465) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce 920MX
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.1 (Radeon R7 M465) vs None (GeForce 920MX). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M465) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX).

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce 920MX
Encoder	VCE 3.1	None
Decoder	UVD 6.0	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M465 draws 75W versus the GeForce 920MX's 16W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M465) vs 350W (GeForce 920MX). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce 920MX
TDP	75W	16W-79%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	14.1	66.5+372%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce 920MX launched at $100 and now averages $54. The Radeon R7 M465 costs 35.2% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.3 (Radeon R7 M465) vs 19.7 (GeForce 920MX) — the Radeon R7 M465 offers 53.8% better value.