Radeon R7 M465
VS
Radeon HD 8750M

Radeon R7 M465 vs Radeon HD 8750M

AMD

Radeon R7 M465

2016Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8750M

2013Core: 670 MHzBoost: 775 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M465 is positioned at rank 384 and the Radeon HD 8750M is on rank 144, so the Radeon HD 8750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465

#374
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1230%
#376
1115%
#377
1112%
#381
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1011%
#382
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1004%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
100%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
99%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
98%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
98%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
97%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
97%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
96%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
95%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
94%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
94%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8750M

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
99%
#134
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
310%
#136
281%
#137
280%
#141
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
255%
#142
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
253%
#144
Radeon HD 8750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
100%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
99%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
96%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
95%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 M465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8750M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 M465Radeon HD 8750M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 M465 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M465 and Radeon HD 8750M

AMD

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8750M

The Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 26 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 670 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M465 scores 1,059 and the Radeon HD 8750M reaches 1,052 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M465 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 8750M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M465) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8750M). Raw compute: 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8750M). Boost clocks: 1125 MHz vs 775 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon HD 8750M
G3D Mark Score
1,059
1,052
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.864 TFLOPS+68%
0.5146 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1125 MHz+45%
775 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
96 KB
96 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon HD 8750M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M465 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8750M has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 8750M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R7 M465) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8750M) — the Radeon HD 8750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon HD 8750M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M465) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8750M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon HD 8750M
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.1 (Radeon R7 M465) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8750M). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M465) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 8750M).

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon HD 8750M
Encoder
VCE 3.1
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 6.0
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M465 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8750M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M465) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8750M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon HD 8750M
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
14.1
21.0+49%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M465 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon HD 8750M
MSRP
$120
Avg Price (30d)
$35
Codename
Topaz
Mars
Release
May 15 2016
February 26 2013
Ranking
#867
#869