Radeon R7 M465
VS
Radeon 535

Radeon R7 M465 vs Radeon 535

AMD

Radeon R7 M465

2016Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 535

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M465 is positioned at rank 384 and the Radeon 535 is on rank 119, so the Radeon 535 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465

#374
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1230%
#376
1115%
#377
1112%
#381
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1011%
#382
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1004%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
100%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
99%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
98%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
98%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
97%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
97%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
96%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
95%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
94%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
94%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
692%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
664%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
657%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
655%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
654%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
650%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
642%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
640%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
634%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
632%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
625%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
623%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
612%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
612%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
94%
#104
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
763%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
99%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
98%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
95%
#127
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
94%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
93%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
92%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 M465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 535.

InsightRadeon R7 M465Radeon 535
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $100), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 188.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 M465Radeon 535
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+188.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($35)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M465 and Radeon 535

AMD

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

AMD

Radeon 535

The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M465 scores 1,059 and the Radeon 535 reaches 1,049 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M465 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon 535 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M465) vs 512 (Radeon 535). Raw compute: 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535). Boost clocks: 1125 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon 535
G3D Mark Score
1,059
1,049
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.864 TFLOPS
1.211 TFLOPS+40%
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1183 MHz+5%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon 535
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R7 M465) vs 256 KB (Radeon 535) — the Radeon 535 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon 535
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M465 draws 75W versus the Radeon 535's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M465) vs 300W (Radeon 535). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon 535
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
14.1
21.0+49%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon 535 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The Radeon R7 M465 costs 65% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.3 (Radeon R7 M465) vs 10.5 (Radeon 535) — the Radeon R7 M465 offers 188.6% better value. The Radeon 535 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon R7 M465Radeon 535
MSRP
$120
$100-17%
Avg Price (30d)
$35-65%
$100
Performance per Dollar
30.3+189%
10.5
Codename
Topaz
Lexa
Release
May 15 2016
April 20 2017
Ranking
#867
#668