Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is positioned at rank #180 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

97%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

95%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

93%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

92%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

90%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

88%

#165

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2228%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

100%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

99%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

97%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

96%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

96%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

95%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

94%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

92%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

92%

#193

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 754.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E.

Insight	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-754.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+754.4%)
Longevity	RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $85 for the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E, it costs 12% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 868.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+868.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($85)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E scores 921 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 754.4%. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is built on Bristol Ridge while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	921	7,869+754%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge	Turing
Process Node	4 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	4096+357%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	47.84 TFLOPS+1503%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2920 MHz+75%	1665 MHz
ROPs	128+300%	32
TMUs	256+357%	56
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	300W	75W-75%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	3.1	104.9+3284%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 11.8% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 871.3% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).