
Radeon R8 M365DX vs Radeon R5 M430

Radeon R8 M365DX
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 M430
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M430
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 M430 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R8 M365DX.
| Insight | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R8 M365DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R8 M365DX holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $20), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 99.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+99.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R8 M365DX and Radeon R5 M430

Radeon R8 M365DX
The Radeon R8 M365DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 647 points.

Radeon R5 M430
The Radeon R5 M430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 649 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R8 M365DX scores 647 and the Radeon R5 M430 reaches 649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R8 M365DX is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M430 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M430). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M430). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 647 | 649 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+100% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS+80% | 0.6592 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1030 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+100% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M430) — the Radeon R8 M365DX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 11_1 (Radeon R5 M430). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11_1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon R5 M430).
| Feature | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.1 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R8 M365DX draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 M430's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R8 M365DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M430). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 21.6+148% | 8.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R8 M365DX launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon R5 M430 launched at $99 and now averages $20. The Radeon R8 M365DX costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.7 (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 32.5 (Radeon R5 M430) — the Radeon R8 M365DX offers 99.1% better value. The Radeon R5 M430 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R8 M365DX | Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-50% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.7+99% | 32.5 |
| Codename | Tropo | Jet |
| Release | May 5 2015 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #769 | #922 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















