Radeon R8 M365DX vs Quadro K510M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K510M

#117

L40

MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174

82%

#317

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

11541%

#332

Quadro K510M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#333

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

100%

#334

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

99%

#335

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

99%

#336

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

98%

#337

Quadro FX 3450

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

98%

#338

GRID P40-24Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200

97%

#339

Quadro 4000

MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30

96%

#340

FireStream 9250

MSRP: $999|Avg: $49

91%

#341

GRID P40-3Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

90%

#342

GRID M10-2Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

84%

#343

Tesla K80

MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50

84%

#344

GRID M10-4Q

MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340

83%

#346

GRID M10-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

81%

#347

FirePro V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170

80%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R8 M365DX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K510M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R8 M365DX	Quadro K510M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R8 M365DX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R8 M365DX Benchmark Check

Quadro K510M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R8 M365DX and Quadro K510M

Radeon R8 M365DX

The Radeon R8 M365DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 647 points.

Quadro K510M

The Quadro K510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 641 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R8 M365DX scores 647 and the Quadro K510M reaches 641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R8 M365DX is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro K510M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 1,536 (Quadro K510M). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K510M).

Feature	Radeon R8 M365DX	Quadro K510M
G3D Mark Score	647	641
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1536+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.184 TFLOPS	2.369 TFLOPS+100%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L1 Cache	160 KB+25%	128 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R8 M365DX	Quadro K510M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R8 M365DX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K510M has 1 GB. The Quadro K510M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 512 KB (Quadro K510M) — the Quadro K510M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R8 M365DX	Quadro K510M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R8 M365DX draws 30W versus the Quadro K510M's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R8 M365DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R8 M365DX) vs 350W (Quadro K510M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.