GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VS
Quadro K510M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro K510M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K510M

2013Core: 771 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
110%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
108%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
108%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
107%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
106%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
106%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
104%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
104%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
103%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
101%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
101%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
101%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
100%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
100%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
100%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
100%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
99%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
99%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
99%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
98%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
96%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
94%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
93%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
93%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
93%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
92%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
91%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
91%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
90%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K510M

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
82%
#317
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11541%
#332
Quadro K510M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#333
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
100%
#334
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
99%
#335
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
99%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
98%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
98%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
97%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
96%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
91%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
90%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
84%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
84%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
83%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
81%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K510M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3433.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K510M.

InsightGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro K510M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3433.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3433.7%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro K510M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

Quadro K510M

The Quadro K510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 641 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro K510M's 641 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 3433.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K510M uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,536 (Quadro K510M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K510M).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro K510M
G3D Mark Score
22,651+3434%
641
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Kepler
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4352+183%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+831%
2.369 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
136+6%
128
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+3208%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+6300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K510M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K510M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro K510M
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K510M has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K510M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro K510M
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+700%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
32 MB+6300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro K510M's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro K510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K510M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro K510M
TDP
160W
100W-38%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
141.6+2112%
6.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro K510M
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$380
Codename
AD106
GK104
Release
May 18 2023
July 23 2013
Ranking
#59
#562