
Radeon R9 255

Radeon RX Vega 6
Radeon R9 255 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 255 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 255 vs Radeon RX Vega 6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 255
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega 6 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 255 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 295W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 6 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon RX Vega 6
2017Why buy it
- ✅8.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ❌55.3% higher power demand at 295W vs 190W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 255 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 255
The Radeon R9 255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,501 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon RX Vega 6
The Radeon RX Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,492 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 255 scores 1,501 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 reaches 1,492 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 255 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 6 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 255) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 6). Raw compute: 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 255) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 6).
| Feature | Radeon R9 255 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,501 | 1,492 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 4096+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.29 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+285% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 256+129% |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 1 MB+127% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 255 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 255 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 carries 0 MB. Radeon R9 255 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 255 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 6. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 255) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 6) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 255 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 255 draws 190W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6's 295W — a 43.3% difference. The Radeon R9 255 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon R9 255) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R9 255 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-36% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 7.9+55% | 5.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 255 came in at $139, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 6 was 100+% cheaper ($139 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.8 (Radeon R9 255) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 6 (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 255 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | Tonga | Vega 10 |
| Release | September 2 2014 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #365 | #171 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















