Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 255
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 255
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 255 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 255
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
Radeon R9 255
The Radeon R9 255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,501 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Radeon R9 255 reaches 1,501 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon R9 255 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 255). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 255).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538+2% | 1,501 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1792+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 3.29 TFLOPS+289% |
| ROPs | 6 | 32+433% |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 255 has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 255 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 255's 190W — a 170.7% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 400W (Radeon R9 255). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-92% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 400W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5+1197% | 7.9 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R9 255 launched at $139 and now averages $30. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 50.0 (Radeon R9 255) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 255 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $139 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 50.0 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Tonga |
| Release | September 5 2014 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #763 | #365 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 255
