Radeon R9 255 vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 255 vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 255 vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 255

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 255 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1166.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 15W.

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 190W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 255 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,501 vs 1,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 255 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 28nm process instead of Unknown node, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 0. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 255 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon R9 255 vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 255

The Radeon R9 255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,501 points. Launch price was $249.

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. The core clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 255 scores 1,501 and the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 255) vs 32 (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)).

Feature	Radeon R9 255	UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
G3D Mark Score	1,501	1,500
Shading Units	1792+5500%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 255	UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 255 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) carries 0 MB. Radeon R9 255 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 255 and System on the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake).

Feature	Radeon R9 255	UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 255 draws 190W versus the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)'s 15W — a 170.7% difference. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon R9 255) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

Feature	Radeon R9 255	UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
TDP	190W	15W-92%
Recommended PSU	400W	1W-100%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Integrated
Perf/Watt	7.9	100.0+1166%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 255 came in at $139, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) was 100+% cheaper ($139 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.8 (Radeon R9 255) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) offers Infinity% better value.

Feature	Radeon R9 255	UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
MSRP	$139	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	10.8	Infinity
Codename	Tonga	—
Release	September 2 2014	sem dados
Ranking	#365	#776

Search Radeon R9 255 on Amazon

Search UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.