
Radeon R9 280 vs GRID P40-12Q

Radeon R9 280
Popular choices:

GRID P40-12Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-12Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-12Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 280.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 280 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 280 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $5,699), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 14126.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14126.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280 and GRID P40-12Q

Radeon R9 280
The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.

GRID P40-12Q
The GRID P40-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280 scores 5,532 and the GRID P40-12Q reaches 5,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID P40-12Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 280) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-12Q). Raw compute: 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-12Q). Boost clocks: 933 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,532 | 5,540 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.344 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 933 MHz | 1178 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 768 KB+71% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-12Q has 4 GB. The GRID P40-12Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-12Q) — the GRID P40-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280 draws 200W versus the GRID P40-12Q's 225W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon R9 280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280) vs 350W (GRID P40-12Q). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-11% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 27.7+13% | 24.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 280 launched at $279 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GRID P40-12Q launched at $5699 and now averages $5699. The Radeon R9 280 costs 99.3% less ($5659 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 138.3 (Radeon R9 280) vs 1.0 (GRID P40-12Q) — the Radeon R9 280 offers 13730% better value. The GRID P40-12Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | GRID P40-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279-95% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-99% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 138.3+13730% | 1.0 |
| Codename | Tahiti | GM204 |
| Release | March 4 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #415 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















