Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- β 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012β2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 / 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2014 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β40.2% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 285 / 380
2014Why buy it
- β 1.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $80 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- β Delivers 40.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.9 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 280
The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280 scores 5,532 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 280) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,532 | 5,550 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.344 TFLOPS+2% | 3.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 280 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 240 GB/s (Radeon R9 280) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285 / 380) β a 36.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 280. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon R9 280) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) β the Radeon R9 280 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 240 GB/s+36% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280 draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W β a 5.1% difference. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 190W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | β | 221mm |
| Height | β | 111mm |
| Slots | β | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.7 | 29.2+5% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 280 came in at $279, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 / 380 was 28.7% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.8 (Radeon R9 280) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) β the Radeon R9 285 / 380 offers 40.9% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279 | $199-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.8 | 27.9+41% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Tonga |
| Release | March 4 2014 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #415 | #365 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















