GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 280

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 280 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 280: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 690

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 280 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
258.1% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Radeon R9 280

2014

Why buy it

✅16.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 257.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 280 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 690 instead at 5,536 vs 5,532, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 690 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 280 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $720 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 257.8% (19.8 vs 5.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 280 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 690 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 280 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 690

The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon R9 280

The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 and the Radeon R9 280 reaches 5,532 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 933 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 280
G3D Mark Score	5,536	5,532
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072 ×2+71%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.13 TFLOPS ×2	3.344 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock	1019 MHz+9%	933 MHz
ROPs	32 ×2	32
TMUs	128 ×2+14%	112
L1 Cache	128 KB	448 KB+250%
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 690 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 280 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 280
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 690 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 carries 3 GB. Radeon R9 280 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 240 GB/s (Radeon R9 280) — a 24.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 280. Memory bus width is 256-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 690 and 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 690) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 280) — the Radeon R9 280 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 280
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192.2 GB/s x2	240 GB/s+25%
Bus Width	256-bit x2	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 280
TDP	300W	200W-33%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	279mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	18.5	27.7+50%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 690 came in at $999, while the Radeon R9 280 launched at $279. On MSRP, Radeon R9 280 was 72.1% cheaper ($720 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 19.8 (Radeon R9 280) — the Radeon R9 280 offers 260% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 280 (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 280
MSRP	$999	$279-72%
Performance per Dollar	5.5	19.8+260%
Codename	GK104	Tahiti
Release	May 3 2012	March 4 2014
Ranking	#414	#415

Search GeForce GTX 690 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 280 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.