GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon TM

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon TM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon TM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 690

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon TM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.

Radeon TM

2024

Why buy it

✅14.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon TM is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (5,564 vs 5,536), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon TM is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, and 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 690 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 690 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon TM has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon TM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 690

The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon TM
G3D Mark Score	5,536	5,564
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	3072 ×2+200%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.13 TFLOPS ×2	5.939 TFLOPS+90%
Boost Clock	1019 MHz	2900 MHz+185%
ROPs	32 ×2	32
TMUs	128 ×2+100%	64
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 690 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon TM leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon TM
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 690 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM carries 4 GB. Radeon TM gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 690 and 128-bit on the Radeon TM. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 690) vs 2 MB (Radeon TM) — the Radeon TM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon TM
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit x2+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 181% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon TM
TDP	300W	15W-95%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	279mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	18.5	370.9+1905%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon TM (2024 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon TM
MSRP	$999	—
Codename	GK104	Strix Point
Release	May 3 2012	July 15 2024
Ranking	#414	#312

Search GeForce GTX 690 on Amazon

Search Radeon TM on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.