GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 690

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 1019 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016Core: 713 MHzBoost: 1086 MHz

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 690

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 5100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

  • 42.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 98.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • 295.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 690 instead at 5,536 vs 5,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 690 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 5100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $500 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.9% (11.0 vs 5.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 690 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 690

The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 1086 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 690Radeon Pro WX 5100
G3D Mark Score
5,536
5,500
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3072 ×2+71%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.13 TFLOPS ×2
3.892 TFLOPS+24%
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
1086 MHz+7%
ROPs
32 ×2
32
TMUs
128 ×2+14%
112
L1 Cache
128 KB
448 KB+250%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 690 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 690Radeon Pro WX 5100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 690 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 5100 gives you 295.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 690 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 5100. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 690) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 690Radeon Pro WX 5100
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
7.906 GB+295%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit x2+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 690Radeon Pro WX 5100
DirectX
12_0
12 (12_0)
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 690) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: VP5 vs UVD 6.3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 690Radeon Pro WX 5100
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VCE 3.4
Decoder
VP5
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 690Radeon Pro WX 5100
TDP
300W
75W-75%
Recommended PSU
650W
350W-46%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
279mm
173mm
Height
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
82°C
Perf/Watt
18.5
73.3+296%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 690 came in at $999, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 launched at $499. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 5100 was 50.1% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 11.0 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 5100 (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 690Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP
$999
$499-50%
Performance per Dollar
5.5
11.0+100%
Codename
GK104
Ellesmere
Release
May 3 2012
November 18 2016
Ranking
#414
#416

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.