
GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 690
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 690 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 690 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 690 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $75), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 67.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 690 and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 690
The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,536 | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 ×2+20% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz+13% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 690 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — a 25.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 690. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s x2+25% | 153.6 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | 256-bit x2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 200W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 200W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5 | 27.5+49% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 690 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 690 costs 40% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 123.0 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 73.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — the GeForce GTX 690 offers 67.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $300-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-40% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 123.0+68% | 73.3 |
| Codename | GK104 | Neptune CF |
| Release | May 3 2012 | May 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #414 | #350 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















