
GeForce GTX 690

Radeon PRO W6300
GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon PRO W6300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon PRO W6300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon PRO W6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 690
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌399.5% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 300W vs 25W.
Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $799 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 401.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 300W, a 275W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon PRO W6300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 690
The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,536 | 5,560 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 ×2+300% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 | 3.133 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | 2040 MHz+100% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 690 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 690 and 128-bit on the Radeon PRO W6300. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 690) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 169.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 25W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5 | 222.4+1102% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 690 came in at $999, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6300 was 80% cheaper ($799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 offers 405.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6300 (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $200-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 27.8+405% |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 24 |
| Release | May 3 2012 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #414 | #413 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














