
GeForce GTX 690

GRID M60-8A
GeForce GTX 690 vs GRID M60-8A Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 690 vs GRID M60-8A FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 690 vs GRID M60-8A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 690
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,501 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
- ❌27800% longer card at 279mm vs 1mm.
GRID M60-8A
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 279mm, a 278mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 690 vs GRID M60-8A Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 690
The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

GRID M60-8A
The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 and the GRID M60-8A reaches 5,523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the GRID M60-8A uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-8A). Raw compute: 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8A). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,536 | 5,523 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 ×2+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 | 4.825 TFLOPS+54% |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | 1178 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 ×2 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 690 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M60-8A leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 690 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-8A carries 4 GB. GRID M60-8A gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 690 and 128-bit on the GRID M60-8A. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 690) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-8A) — the GRID M60-8A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 12_1 (GRID M60-8A). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the GRID M60-8A's 225W — a 28.6% difference. The GRID M60-8A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 350W (GRID M60-8A). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 225W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5 | 24.5+32% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 690 came in at $999, while the GRID M60-8A launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 690 was 60% cheaper ($1501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 2.2 (GRID M60-8A) — the GeForce GTX 690 offers 150% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-8A (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-60% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5+150% | 2.2 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM204 |
| Release | May 3 2012 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #414 | #505 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














