GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 690

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 1019 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014Core: 918 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 690

2 GB 300

5,536

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2 GB 190

5,550

+0.3%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 690

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 / 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
402% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌57.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 190W.

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014

Why buy it

✅18.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 403.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.9 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 190W instead of 300W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 221mm instead of 279mm, a 58mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (5,550 vs 5,536), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 690 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 285 / 380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $800 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 403.3% (27.9 vs 5.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 690 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 690

The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon R9 285 / 380

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 285 / 380
G3D Mark Score	5,536	5,550
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072 ×2+71%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.13 TFLOPS ×2	3.29 TFLOPS+5%
ROPs	32 ×2	32
TMUs	128 ×2+14%	112
L1 Cache	128 KB	448 KB+250%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 690 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 285 / 380
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — a 9.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 690. Memory bus width is 256-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 690 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 285 / 380
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192.2 GB/s x2+9%	176 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit x2	256-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 285 / 380
DirectX	12_0	12
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 690) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: VP5 vs UVD 5.0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 285 / 380
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	VP5	UVD 5.0
Codecs	—	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 44.9% difference. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 285 / 380
TDP	300W	190W-37%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	2x 6-pin
Length	279mm	221mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Perf/Watt	18.5	29.2+58%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 690 came in at $999, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 / 380 was 80.1% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon R9 285 / 380 offers 407.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 285 / 380 (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	Radeon R9 285 / 380
MSRP	$999	$199-80%
Performance per Dollar	5.5	27.9+407%
Codename	GK104	Tonga
Release	May 3 2012	September 2 2014
Ranking	#414	#365

Search GeForce GTX 690 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 285 / 380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.