
GeForce GTX 690
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 285 / 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 690.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 690 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 690 holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $199), it costs 77% less, resulting in a 341.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+341.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 690 and Radeon R9 285 / 380

GeForce GTX 690
The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,536 | 5,550 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 ×2+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 | 3.29 TFLOPS+5% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 448 KB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — a 9.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 690. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s x2+9% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 690) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: VP5 vs UVD 5.0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VP5 | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 44.9% difference. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 190W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 279mm | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5 | 29.2+58% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 690 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199 and now averages $199. The GeForce GTX 690 costs 77.4% less ($154 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 123.0 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the GeForce GTX 690 offers 340.9% better value. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $199-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-77% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 123.0+341% | 27.9 |
| Codename | GK104 | Tonga |
| Release | May 3 2012 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #414 | #365 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















