GRID M60-8A
VS
Radeon R9 280

GRID M60-8A vs Radeon R9 280

GRID M60-8A

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 280

2014Boost: 933 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M60-8A is positioned at rank #280 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-8A

#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
95%
#111
Tesla P40
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150
94%
#112
GRID RTX6000-1Q
MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500
90%
#113
Quadro RTX 8000
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999
90%
#264
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6685%
#279
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
100%
#280
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
100%
#282
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
97%
#284
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
95%
#286
Tesla C2070
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $38
94%
#288
Quadro 2000 D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
94%
#289
FirePro V5900
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
93%
#290
FirePro S9000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156
91%
#293
GRID P40-4Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
90%
#294
RTXA5000-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 280 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID M60-8A offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGRID M60-8ARadeon R9 280
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 280 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 280 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $120), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 200.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGRID M60-8ARadeon R9 280
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+200.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-8A and Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA

GRID M60-8A

The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 280

The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-8A scores 5,523 and the Radeon R9 280 reaches 5,532 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-8A is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-8A) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8A) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 933 MHz.

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon R9 280
G3D Mark Score
5,523
5,532
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+14%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+44%
3.344 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+26%
933 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+14%
112
L1 Cache
768 KB+71%
448 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon R9 280
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-8A comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 has 3 GB. The GRID M60-8A offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-8A) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280) — the GRID M60-8A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon R9 280
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-8A draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon R9 280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-8A) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon R9 280
TDP
225W
200W-11%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
24.5
27.7+13%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M60-8A launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon R9 280 launched at $279 and now averages $40. The Radeon R9 280 costs 66.7% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.0 (GRID M60-8A) vs 138.3 (Radeon R9 280) — the Radeon R9 280 offers 200.7% better value. The GRID M60-8A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon R9 280
MSRP
$2500
$279-89%
Avg Price (30d)
$120
$40-67%
Performance per Dollar
46.0
138.3+201%
Codename
GM204
Tahiti
Release
August 30 2015
March 4 2014
Ranking
#505
#415