
GRID M60-8A

Radeon R9 285 / 380
GRID M60-8A vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M60-8A vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M60-8A vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M60-8A
2015Why buy it
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- β Measures 1mm instead of 221mm, a 220mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- β More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014β2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β1156.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- β18.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 190W.
Radeon R9 285 / 380
2014Why buy it
- β Costs $2,301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1162.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.9 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- β Draws 190W instead of 225W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β22000% longer card at 221mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M60-8A vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-8A
The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.

Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-8A scores 5,523 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-8A is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-8A) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8A) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,523 | 5,550 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+47% | 3.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+71% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-8A has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 carries 2 GB. GRID M60-8A gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID M60-8A and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-8A) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) β the GRID M60-8A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-8A) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-8A draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W β a 16.9% difference. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-8A) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 190W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 221mm |
| Height | β | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 24.5 | 29.2+19% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M60-8A came in at $2500, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 / 380 was 92% cheaper ($2301 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID M60-8A) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) β the Radeon R9 285 / 380 offers 1168.2% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-8A (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID M60-8A | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $199-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2 | 27.9+1168% |
| Codename | GM204 | Tonga |
| Release | August 30 2015 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #505 | #365 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














