GRID M60-8A vs Radeon PRO W6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-8A vs Radeon PRO W6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M60-8A vs Radeon PRO W6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-8A

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1150% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,300 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1158.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W6300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (5,560 vs 5,523), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,300 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1158.4% (27.8 vs 2.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID M60-8A vs Radeon PRO W6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-8A

The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-8A scores 5,523 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-8A is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-8A) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8A) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

Feature	GRID M60-8A	Radeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score	5,523	5,560
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048+167%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+54%	3.133 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	2040 MHz+73%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-8A	Radeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-8A has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 carries 2 GB. GRID M60-8A gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID M60-8A and 128-bit on the Radeon PRO W6300. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-8A) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GRID M60-8A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-8A	Radeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-8A draws 225W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 160% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-8A) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M60-8A	Radeon PRO W6300
TDP	225W	25W-89%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	24.5	222.4+808%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-8A came in at $2500, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6300 was 92% cheaper ($2300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID M60-8A) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 offers 1163.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6300 (2022 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID M60-8A	Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP	$2500	$200-92%
Performance per Dollar	2.2	27.8+1164%
Codename	GM204	Navi 24
Release	August 30 2015	January 19 2022
Ranking	#505	#413

Search GRID M60-8A on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.