GRID M60-8A vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

GRID M60-8A

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016Core: 713 MHzBoost: 1086 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID M60-8A vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-8A vs Radeon Pro WX 5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-8A

2015

Why buy it

  • Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 401% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,001 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 398.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • 97.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M60-8A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (5,523 vs 5,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M60-8A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 5100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,001 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 398.9% (11.0 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M60-8A has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-8A vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-8A

The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-8A scores 5,523 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-8A is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-8A) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8A) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1086 MHz.

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon Pro WX 5100
G3D Mark Score
5,523
5,500
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+14%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+24%
3.892 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+8%
1086 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+14%
112
L1 Cache
768 KB+71%
448 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon Pro WX 5100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-8A has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 5100 gives you 97.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID M60-8A and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 5100.

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon Pro WX 5100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
7.906 GB+98%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-8A) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon Pro WX 5100
DirectX
12_1
12 (12_0)
Max Displays
0
4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-8A draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-8A) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon Pro WX 5100
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
173mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
82°C
Perf/Watt
24.5
73.3+199%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-8A came in at $2500, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 launched at $499. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 5100 was 80% cheaper ($2001 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID M60-8A) vs 11.0 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 400% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 5100 (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID M60-8ARadeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP
$2500
$499-80%
Performance per Dollar
2.2
11.0+400%
Codename
GM204
Ellesmere
Release
August 30 2015
November 18 2016
Ranking
#505
#416

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.