Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon R9 290 / 390

AMD

Radeon R9 290

2013Core: 947 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon R9 290 / 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 290

2013

Why buy it

  • 1.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 21.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 24.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Radeon R9 290 / 390

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $70 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 290 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (8,184 vs 8,150), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 290 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 290 / 390 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $329 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 20.8% (24.8 vs 20.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 290 / 390 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R9 290 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon R9 290 / 390 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R9 290

The Radeon R9 290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,184 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon R9 290 / 390

The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 290 scores 8,184 and the Radeon R9 290 / 390 reaches 8,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 290) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Raw compute: 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390).

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 290 / 390
G3D Mark Score
8,184
8,150
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.849 TFLOPS
5.12 TFLOPS+6%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
160
L1 Cache
640 KB
640 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 290 / 390
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290 and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290 / 390.

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 290 / 390
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
320 GB/s
Bus Width
512-bit
512-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 290 / 390
DirectX
12.0
12.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390).

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 290 / 390
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 290 draws 275W versus the Radeon R9 290 / 390's 300W — a 8.7% difference. The Radeon R9 290 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 95°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 290 / 390
TDP
275W-8%
300W
Recommended PSU
750W
750W
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
275mm
275mm
Height
109mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
95°C
Perf/Watt
29.8+10%
27.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 290 came in at $399, while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 launched at $329. On MSRP, Radeon R9 290 / 390 was 17.5% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.5 (Radeon R9 290) vs 24.8 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon R9 290 / 390 offers 21% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 290 / 390 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 290 / 390
MSRP
$399
$329-18%
Performance per Dollar
20.5
24.8+21%
Codename
Hawaii
Grenada
Release
November 5 2013
June 18 2015
Ranking
#316
#296

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.