
Radeon R9 290

Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon R9 290X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon R9 290X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon R9 290X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 290
2013Why buy it
- ✅0.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 275W instead of 350W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon R9 290X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌37.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 20.5 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌27.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 275W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 290 vs Radeon R9 290X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 290
The Radeon R9 290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,184 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 290 scores 8,184 and the Radeon R9 290X reaches 8,426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 290) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,184 | 8,426+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2816+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.849 TFLOPS | 5.632 TFLOPS+16% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 176+10% |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB | 704 KB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290 and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290X.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit | 512-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 290 draws 275W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 24% difference. The Radeon R9 290 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W-21% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 275mm |
| Height | 109mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.8+24% | 24.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 290 came in at $399, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549. On MSRP, Radeon R9 290 was 27.3% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.5 (Radeon R9 290) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) — the Radeon R9 290 offers 34% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 290 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-27% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.5+34% | 15.3 |
| Codename | Hawaii | Hawaii |
| Release | November 5 2013 | October 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #316 | #342 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














