Radeon R9 290X / 390X vs Radeon R9 290

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 290.

Insight	Radeon R9 290X / 390X	Radeon R9 290
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (275mm)	Standard Size (275mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 290 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 290 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $60), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 17.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 290X / 390X	Radeon R9 290
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+17.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 290X / 390X Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 290 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 290X / 390X and Radeon R9 290

Radeon R9 290X / 390X

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,380 points. Launch price was $429.

Radeon R9 290

The Radeon R9 290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,184 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X scores 8,380 and the Radeon R9 290 reaches 8,184 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R9 290 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290).

Feature	Radeon R9 290X / 390X	Radeon R9 290
G3D Mark Score	8,380+2%	8,184
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2816+10%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.914 TFLOPS+22%	4.849 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	176+10%	160
L1 Cache	704 KB+10%	640 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 290X / 390X	Radeon R9 290
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 512-bit vs 512-bit.

Feature	Radeon R9 290X / 390X	Radeon R9 290
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	320 GB/s	320 GB/s
Bus Width	512-bit	512-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon R9 290X / 390X	Radeon R9 290
DirectX	12.0	12.0
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6	6

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290).

Feature	Radeon R9 290X / 390X	Radeon R9 290
Encoder	VCE 2.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	UVD 4.2	UVD 4.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X draws 275W versus the Radeon R9 290's 275W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 290 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 95°C.

Feature	Radeon R9 290X / 390X	Radeon R9 290
TDP	275W	275W
Recommended PSU	750W	750W
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	275mm	275mm
Height	109mm	109mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	95°C	95°C
Perf/Watt	30.5+2%	29.8

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 290X / 390X launched at $549 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon R9 290 launched at $399 and now averages $50. The Radeon R9 290 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 139.7 (Radeon R9 290X / 390X) vs 163.7 (Radeon R9 290) — the Radeon R9 290 offers 17.2% better value. The Radeon R9 290X / 390X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).