Radeon R9 380 vs GRID P40-4Q
Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:
GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-4Q.
| Insight | Radeon R9 380 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 203.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 380 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+203.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380 and GRID P40-4Q
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 380 scores 6,000 and the GRID P40-4Q reaches 5,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 380) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000+1% | 5,926 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+17% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.476 TFLOPS+52% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+250% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 380 draws 220W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 2.2% difference. The Radeon R9 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-2% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.3+4% | 26.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 380 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 380 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 120.0 (Radeon R9 380) vs 39.5 (GRID P40-4Q) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 203.8% better value. The Radeon R9 380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-93% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-67% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.0+204% | 39.5 |
| Codename | Antigua | GK104 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #396 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 380 and GRID P40-4Q
