
Radeon R9 380 vs Radeon R9 380X

Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 380X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 380.
| Insight | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $58), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 13.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+13.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($58) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380 and Radeon R9 380X

Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 380 scores 6,000 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 380) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000 | 6,131+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.476 TFLOPS | 3.973 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 970 MHz | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 512 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 72.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 380. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s+72% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | — | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 380 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The Radeon R9 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.3+11% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 380 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229 and now averages $58. The Radeon R9 380 costs 13.8% less ($8 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 120.0 (Radeon R9 380) vs 105.7 (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 13.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-13% | $229 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-14% | $58 |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.0+14% | 105.7 |
| Codename | Antigua | Antigua |
| Release | June 18 2015 | November 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #396 | #394 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















