Radeon R9 380
VS
Radeon R9 380X

Radeon R9 380 vs Radeon R9 380X

AMD

Radeon R9 380

2015Boost: 970 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 380X

2015Boost: 970 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 380X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 380.

InsightRadeon R9 380Radeon R9 380X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $58), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 13.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 380Radeon R9 380X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+13.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($58)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380 and Radeon R9 380X

AMD

Radeon R9 380

The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon R9 380X

The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 380 scores 6,000 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 380) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 970 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon R9 380X
G3D Mark Score
6,000
6,131+2%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792
2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.476 TFLOPS
3.973 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock
970 MHz
970 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112
128+14%
L1 Cache
448 KB
512 KB+14%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon R9 380X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 72.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 380. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon R9 380X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
182.4 GB/s+72%
106 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X).

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon R9 380X
Encoder
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 380 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The Radeon R9 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon R9 380X
TDP
220W-12%
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
221mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
27.3+11%
24.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 380 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229 and now averages $58. The Radeon R9 380 costs 13.8% less ($8 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 120.0 (Radeon R9 380) vs 105.7 (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 13.5% better value.

FeatureRadeon R9 380Radeon R9 380X
MSRP
$199-13%
$229
Avg Price (30d)
$50-14%
$58
Performance per Dollar
120.0+14%
105.7
Codename
Antigua
Antigua
Release
June 18 2015
November 19 2015
Ranking
#396
#394