Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 380 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $60), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 18% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+18%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 280X and Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,100+2% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+18% | 3.476 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+3% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+14% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 380 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 380 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) vs 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) — a 57.9% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 380) — the Radeon R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+58% | 182.4 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 280X) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | — |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-9% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5+12% | 27.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199 and now averages $50. The Radeon R9 380 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 120.0 (Radeon R9 380) — the Radeon R9 380 offers 18% better value. The Radeon R9 380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $199-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $50-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 101.7 | 120.0+18% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Antigua |
| Release | October 8 2013 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #404 | #396 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 280X and Radeon R9 380
