
Radeon R9 280X

Radeon R9 380X
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon R9 380X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon R9 380X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon R9 380X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌30.6% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon R9 380X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon R9 380X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 280X scores 6,100 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,100 | 6,131 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+3% | 3.973 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+3% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 280X has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 380X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 380X gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 171.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280X and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 380X. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon R9 280X) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+172% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 280X) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 280X) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 30.5+24% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 280X came in at $299, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon R9 380X was 23.4% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.4 (Radeon R9 280X) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 380X) — the Radeon R9 380X offers 31.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 380X (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 280X | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $229-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.4 | 26.8+31% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Antigua |
| Release | October 8 2013 | November 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #404 | #394 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















