Quadro K5200 vs Radeon R9 280X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K5200 is positioned at rank #254 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

98%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

95%

#237

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5411%

#252

L2

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

100%

#253

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

100%

#254

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

100%

#256

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

98%

#257

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

98%

#258

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

97%

#259

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

97%

#260

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

97%

#262

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

94%

#263

GRID M40

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

92%

#264

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

92%

#265

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

92%

#266

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

91%

#267

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (8 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 280X.

Insight	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 280X
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+166.7%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 280X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $70), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 15.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 280X
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+15.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70)	✅More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K5200 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 280X Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5200 and Radeon R9 280X

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Radeon R9 280X

The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Radeon R9 280X reaches 6,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 280X
G3D Mark Score	6,149	6,100
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+13%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.553 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+15%
Boost Clock	771 MHz	1000 MHz+30%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+50%	128

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 280X
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280X has 3 GB. The Quadro K5200 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) — a 36.5% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 280X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+167%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	211 GB/s	288 GB/s+36%
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 280X's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro K5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

Feature	Quadro K5200	Radeon R9 280X
TDP	150W-25%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin + 8-pin
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	41.0+34%	30.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 280X costs 14.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.8 (Quadro K5200) vs 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 15.8% better value. The Quadro K5200 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).