FirePro W9000
Quadro K5200
FirePro W9000 vs Quadro K5200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W9000 vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W9000 vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌77.7% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$2,250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ❌82.7% higher power demand at 274W vs 150W.
Quadro K5200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,749 less on MSRP ($2,250 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 77.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 274W, a 124W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W9000 vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157 | 6,149 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS+12% | 3.553 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9000 and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 58.5% difference. The Quadro K5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 41.0+82% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W9000 came in at $3999, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, Quadro K5200 was 43.7% cheaper ($1749 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro W9000) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the Quadro K5200 offers 80% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K5200 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $2250-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 2.7+80% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GK110B |
| Release | June 14 2012 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #390 | #391 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W9000 and Quadro K5200
