Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W9000

2012Core: 975 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

FirePro W9000
6 GB 274
6,157
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD8970M
brand logoRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX 560X (móvel)
brand logoRadeon 760M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 7650 GRE
brand logoRadeon RX 7900M
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
4 GB 30
6,314
+2.5%
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 760
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W9000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌813.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 30W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅FirePro W9000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 274W, a 244W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (6,314 vs 6,157), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W9000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q reaches 6,314 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
6,157
6,314+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2048+100%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS+73%
2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+100%
64
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q carries 4 GB. FirePro W9000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9000 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12 (11_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W9000) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
UVD 3.2
NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's 30W — a 160.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 93°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
TDP
274W
30W-89%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
279mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
93°C
75°C-19%
Perf/Watt
22.5
210.5+836%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
MSRP
$3999
—
Codename
Tahiti
TU117
Release
June 14 2012
April 23 2019
Ranking
#390
#383
Search FirePro W9000 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.