FirePro W9000 vs Quadro M4000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W9000 vs Quadro M4000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W9000 vs Quadro M4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W9000

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌174% higher power demand at 274W vs 100W.

Quadro M4000M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 274W, a 174W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W9000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (6,157 vs 6,148), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro W9000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro W9000 vs Quadro M4000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Quadro M4000M

The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the Quadro M4000M reaches 6,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M).

Feature	FirePro W9000	Quadro M4000M
G3D Mark Score	6,157	6,148
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+60%	1,280
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.994 TFLOPS+60%	2.496 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	128+60%	80
L1 Cache	512 KB+7%	480 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W9000	Quadro M4000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000M carries 4 GB. FirePro W9000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9000 and 256-bit on the Quadro M4000M. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000M) — the Quadro M4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W9000	Quadro M4000M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro W9000	Quadro M4000M
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W9000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M).

Feature	FirePro W9000	Quadro M4000M
Encoder	VCE 1.0	NVENC 5
Decoder	UVD 3.2	NVDEC 1
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 93% difference. The Quadro M4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 93°C vs 80°C.

Feature	FirePro W9000	Quadro M4000M
TDP	274W	100W-64%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	279mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	93°C	80°C-14%
Perf/Watt	22.5	61.5+173%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M4000M (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro W9000	Quadro M4000M
MSRP	$3999	—
Codename	Tahiti	GM204
Release	June 14 2012	August 18 2015
Ranking	#390	#392

Search FirePro W9000 on Amazon

Search Quadro M4000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.