FirePro W9000 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU
FirePro W9000
Popular choices:
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W9000 is positioned at rank 317 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU is on rank 122, so the RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The RTX A500 Embedded GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A500 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and RTX A500 Embedded GPU
FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157 | 6,197 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS | 5.468 TFLOPS+37% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) — the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 172.8% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 20W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 309.9+1277% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | — |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA107S |
| Release | June 14 2012 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #390 | #389 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W9000 and RTX A500 Embedded GPU
