Arc Graphics 130T vs FirePro W9000

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

2025
Similar parts
·······
VS

FirePro W9000

2012Core: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc Graphics 130T vs FirePro W9000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 130T vs FirePro W9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,699 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1244% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • FirePro W9000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc Graphics 130T is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 274W, a 259W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

FirePro W9000

2012

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1233% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,999 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 1726.7% higher power demand at 274W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc Graphics 130T is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (6,208 vs 6,157), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 130T is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2025 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130T makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,699 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $3,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1244% (20.7 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc Graphics 130T vs FirePro W9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

AMD

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the FirePro W9000 reaches 6,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the FirePro W9000 uses GCN 1.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 2,048 (FirePro W9000).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TFirePro W9000
G3D Mark Score
6,208
6,157
Architecture
Xe+
GCN 1.0
Shading Units
7
2048+29157%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 130TFirePro W9000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W9000 carries 6 GB. FirePro W9000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130T and 256-bit on the FirePro W9000.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TFirePro W9000
VRAM Capacity
Shared
6 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 (FirePro W9000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TFirePro W9000
DirectX
12.2+2%
12
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
6+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W9000).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TFirePro W9000
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
VCE 1.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the FirePro W9000's 274W — a 179.2% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (FirePro W9000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 279mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 93°C.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TFirePro W9000
TDP
15W-95%
274W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
279mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C-9%
93°C
Perf/Watt
413.9+1740%
22.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 130T came in at $300, while the FirePro W9000 launched at $3999. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 130T was 92.5% cheaper ($3699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 1.5 (FirePro W9000) — the Arc Graphics 130T offers 1280% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130T (2025 vs 2012).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TFirePro W9000
MSRP
$300-92%
$3999
Performance per Dollar
20.7+1280%
1.5
Codename
Tahiti
Release
January 6 2025
June 14 2012
Ranking
#386
#390

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.