Arc Graphics 130T
VS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Arc Graphics 130T vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc Graphics 130T
15
6,208
0.0%
brand logoIris Pro Graphics P580
brand logoIris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
brand logoIris Graphics 550
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
70
6,350
+2.3%
brand logoGeForce GTX 870M
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 760
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Arc Graphics 130T is positioned at rank #239 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T

#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
96%
#229
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
525%
#231
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
476%
#232
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
474%
#236
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
431%
#237
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
428%
#239
Arc Graphics 130T
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
100%
#240
GeForce MX570 A
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#242
GeForce GT 645
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
#252
GeForce 720A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
93%
#253
GeForce GT 520M
MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A
91%
#254
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $60
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130T.

InsightArc Graphics 130TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)
✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%)
Longevity
Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
—
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $65 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 74% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 293.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightArc Graphics 130TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Cost Efficiency
❌Lower cost efficiency
✅Better overall value (+293.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)
✅More affordable ($65)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc Graphics 130T Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low185 FPS
medium135 FPS
high112 FPS
ultra82 FPS
1440p
low96 FPS
medium66 FPS
high53 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low31 FPS
medium24 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low154 FPS
medium117 FPS
high92 FPS
ultra68 FPS
1440p
low95 FPS
medium74 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra43 FPS
4K
low30 FPS
medium24 FPS
high20 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low205 FPS
medium139 FPS
high70 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1440p
low102 FPS
medium77 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra26 FPS
4K
low51 FPS
medium38 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low133 FPS
medium96 FPS
high72 FPS
ultra50 FPS
1440p
low71 FPS
medium55 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra24 FPS
4K
low27 FPS
medium20 FPS
high14 FPS
ultra10 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low279 FPS
medium223 FPS
high186 FPS
ultra140 FPS
1440p
low210 FPS
medium168 FPS
high140 FPS
ultra105 FPS
4K
low140 FPS
medium112 FPS
high93 FPS
ultra70 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low286 FPS
medium229 FPS
high190 FPS
ultra143 FPS
1440p
low201 FPS
medium171 FPS
high143 FPS
ultra107 FPS
4K
low83 FPS
medium77 FPS
high68 FPS
ultra50 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low111 FPS
medium98 FPS
high76 FPS
ultra54 FPS
1440p
low76 FPS
medium67 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra36 FPS
4K
low51 FPS
medium42 FPS
high26 FPS
ultra19 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low193 FPS
medium162 FPS
high136 FPS
ultra117 FPS
1440p
low186 FPS
medium171 FPS
high143 FPS
ultra107 FPS
4K
low110 FPS
medium99 FPS
high72 FPS
ultra56 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti reaches 6,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses Pascal. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
G3D Mark Score
6,208
6,350+2%
Architecture
Xe+
Pascal
Shading Units
7
768+10871%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
112 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
DirectX
12.2+2%
12_1
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's 70W — a 129.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 211mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
TDP
15W-79%
70W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
0mm
211mm
Height
0mm
—
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
—
Perf/Watt
413.9+356%
90.7
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 and now averages $65. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 74% less ($185 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 294% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
MSRP
$300
$140-53%
Avg Price (30d)
$250
$65-74%
Performance per Dollar
24.8
97.7+294%
Codename
—
GP107
Release
January 6 2025
October 25 2016
Ranking
#386
#381