
Arc Graphics 130T vs Radeon Pro 570

Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 130T is positioned at rank 239 and the Radeon Pro 570 is on rank 78, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 570 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130T.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 155.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+155.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and Radeon Pro 570

Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,337+2% |
| Architecture | Xe+ | GCN 4.0 |
| Shading Units | 7 | 1792+25500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 570 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 155.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-88% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 413.9+684% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 60% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 155.6% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $100-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8 | 63.4+156% |
| Codename | — | Polaris 20 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #386 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















