Arc Graphics 130T vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 130T is positioned at rank 239 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU is on rank 122, so the RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130T | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 130T remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,197 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Ampere |
| Shading Units | 7 | 2048+29157% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 28.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-25% | 20W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 82mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 413.9+34% | 309.9 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | — |
| Codename | — | GA107S |
| Release | January 6 2025 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #386 | #389 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130T and RTX A500 Embedded GPU
