Arc Graphics 130T
Quadro K5200
Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro K5200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 130T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,950 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 657.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Quadro K5200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc Graphics 130T is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quadro K5200
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌650% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,149 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Kepler |
| Shading Units | 7 | 2304+32814% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130T and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 413.9+910% | 41.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 130T came in at $300, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 130T was 86.7% cheaper ($1950 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the Arc Graphics 130T offers 666.7% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130T (2025 vs 2014).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-87% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7+667% | 2.7 |
| Codename | — | GK110B |
| Release | January 6 2025 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #386 | #391 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130T and Quadro K5200
